Taking on the U.S. Supreme Court
When Steve Shadowen 鈥80 and Bob Hilliard 鈥80 learned about the case of Sergio Hernandez, they immediately thought: That鈥檚 not right.
On June 7, 2010, Hernandez, a 15-year-old Mexican citizen, was playing a game with his friends on the international border outside El Paso: running across the barely flowing Rio Grande to touch the border fence on the north side. A U.S. Border Patrol agent collared one of the boys and shot into the group on the Mexico side of the river, killing Hernandez.
Had the incident occurred in the United States, Hernandez鈥檚 parents could sue. But the U.S. government maintained that, because Hernandez was in Mexico when he was killed, the rule of law did not apply. Hilliard and Shadowen took the case, which they presented to the U.S. Supreme Court in February.
鈥淚 think Bob and I both came out of the university with a real appreciation for the ability to write and to think critically, and together with a passion for social justice, that鈥檚 the anchor of a Holy Cross education,鈥 says Shadowen.
鈥淲hen you鈥檙e in your late 50s you call it a passion for social justice, but when you鈥檙e in your early 20s, you call it a passion for raising hell,鈥 Hilliard quips. 鈥淥ur education at St. Edward鈥檚 gave us permission to learn who we were and what was important to us.鈥
In June, the Supreme Court sent the case back to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, asking it to reconsider the case but stating that the Border Patrol agent did not have qualified immunity from being sued.
鈥淥ur job is to do to the best of our ability what we think is right, and in the end history will be the judge of who was right,鈥 says Shadowen.
